Write documentation for iced_pure

This commit is contained in:
Héctor Ramón Jiménez 2022-05-02 20:16:00 +02:00
parent 68e9eb0a9b
commit e7d595c7de
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG key ID: 140CC052C94F138E
26 changed files with 558 additions and 31 deletions

View file

@ -1,3 +1,93 @@
//! Stateless, pure widgets for iced.
//!
//! # The Elm Architecture, purity, and continuity
//! As you may know, applications made with `iced` use [The Elm Architecture].
//!
//! In a nutshell, this architecture defines the initial state of the application, a way to `view` it, and a way to `update` it after a user interaction. The `update` logic is called after a meaningful user interaction, which in turn updates the state of the application. Then, the `view` logic is executed to redisplay the application.
//!
//! Since `view` logic is only run after an `update`, all of the mutations to the application state must only happen in the `update` logic. If the application state changes anywhere else, the `view` logic will not be rerun and, therefore, the previously generated `view` may stay outdated.
//!
//! However, the `Application` trait in `iced` defines `view` as:
//!
//! ```ignore
//! pub trait Application {
//! fn view(&mut self) -> Element<Self::Message>;
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! As a consequence, the application state can be mutated in `view` logic. The `view` logic in `iced` is __impure__.
//!
//! This impurity is necessary because `iced` puts the burden of widget __continuity__ on its users. In other words, it's up to you to provide `iced` with the internal state of each widget every time `view` is called.
//!
//! If we take a look at the classic `counter` example:
//!
//! ```ignore
//! struct Counter {
//! value: i32,
//! increment_button: button::State,
//! decrement_button: button::State,
//! }
//!
//! // ...
//!
//! impl Counter {
//! pub fn view(&mut self) -> Column<Message> {
//! Column::new()
//! .push(
//! Button::new(&mut self.increment_button, Text::new("+"))
//! .on_press(Message::IncrementPressed),
//! )
//! .push(Text::new(self.value.to_string()).size(50))
//! .push(
//! Button::new(&mut self.decrement_button, Text::new("-"))
//! .on_press(Message::DecrementPressed),
//! )
//! }
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! We can see how we need to keep track of the `button::State` of each `Button` in our `Counter` state and provide a mutable reference to the widgets in our `view` logic. The widgets produced by `view` are __stateful__.
//!
//! While this approach forces users to keep track of widget state and causes impurity, I originally chose it because it allows `iced` to directly consume the widget tree produced by `view`. Since there is no internal state decoupled from `view` maintained by the runtime, `iced` does not need to compare (e.g. reconciliate) widget trees in order to ensure continuity.
//!
//! # Stateless widgets
//! As the library matures, the need for some kind of persistent widget data (see #553) between `view` calls becomes more apparent (e.g. incremental rendering, animations, accessibility, etc.).
//!
//! If we are going to end up having persistent widget data anyways... There is no reason to have impure, stateful widgets anymore!
//!
//! And so I started exploring and ended up creating a new subcrate called `iced_pure`, which introduces a completely stateless implementation for every widget in `iced`.
//!
//! With the help of this crate, we can now write a pure `counter` example:
//!
//! ```ignore
//! struct Counter {
//! value: i32,
//! }
//!
//! // ...
//!
//! impl Counter {
//! fn view(&self) -> Column<Message> {
//! Column::new()
//! .push(Button::new("Increment").on_press(Message::IncrementPressed))
//! .push(Text::new(self.value.to_string()).size(50))
//! .push(Button::new("Decrement").on_press(Message::DecrementPressed))
//! }
//! }
//! ```
//!
//! Notice how we no longer need to keep track of the `button::State`! The widgets in `iced_pure` do not take any mutable application state in `view`. They are __stateless__ widgets. As a consequence, we do not need mutable access to `self` in `view` anymore. `view` becomes __pure__.
//!
//! [The Elm Architecture]: https://guide.elm-lang.org/architecture/
#![doc(
html_logo_url = "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/iced-rs/iced/9ab6923e943f784985e9ef9ca28b10278297225d/docs/logo.svg"
)]
#![deny(missing_docs)]
//#![deny(missing_debug_implementations)]
//#![deny(unused_results)]
#![forbid(unsafe_code)]
//#![forbid(rust_2018_idioms)]
pub mod helpers;
pub mod overlay;
pub mod widget;
@ -16,6 +106,32 @@ use iced_native::mouse;
use iced_native::renderer;
use iced_native::{Clipboard, Length, Point, Rectangle, Shell};
/// A bridge between impure and pure widgets.
///
/// If you already have an existing `iced` application, you do not need to switch completely to the new traits in order to benefit from the `pure` module. Instead, you can leverage the new `Pure` widget to include `pure` widgets in your impure `Application`.
///
/// For instance, let's say we want to use our pure `Counter` in an impure application:
///
/// ```ignore
/// use iced_pure::{self, Pure};
///
/// struct Impure {
/// state: pure::State,
/// counter: Counter,
/// }
///
/// impl Sandbox for Impure {
/// // ...
///
/// pub fn view(&mut self) -> Element<Self::Message> {
/// Pure::new(&mut self.state, self.counter.view()).into()
/// }
/// }
/// ```
///
/// [`Pure`] acts as a bridge between pure and impure widgets. It is completely opt-in and can be used to slowly migrate your application to the new architecture.
///
/// The purification of your application may trigger a bunch of important refactors, since it's far easier to keep your data decoupled from the GUI state with stateless widgets. For this reason, I recommend starting small in the most nested views of your application and slowly expand the purity upwards.
pub struct Pure<'a, Message, Renderer> {
state: &'a mut State,
element: Element<'a, Message, Renderer>,
@ -26,6 +142,7 @@ where
Message: 'a,
Renderer: iced_native::Renderer + 'a,
{
/// Creates a new [`Pure`] widget with the given [`State`] and impure [`Element`].
pub fn new(
state: &'a mut State,
content: impl Into<Element<'a, Message, Renderer>>,
@ -37,6 +154,7 @@ where
}
}
/// The internal state of a [`Pure`] widget.
pub struct State {
state_tree: widget::Tree,
}
@ -48,6 +166,7 @@ impl Default for State {
}
impl State {
/// Creates a new [`State`] for a [`Pure`] widget.
pub fn new() -> Self {
Self {
state_tree: widget::Tree::empty(),